The right to defend oneself is the right to be attached to an individual. This is a natural right that replaces other laws in this country, especially if the threat of individuals to life is very clear. But does this need residents also have the right to bring self-defense weapons?
There are several restrictions on the use and purchase of legal weapons in the United States. Pepper spray is one, if it is not the only self-defense tool, which can be bought legally in all US states. The remaining requirements and restrictions on defense weapons vary from state to country. So, those who want to buy, have and carry a stronger tool for defenses such as weapons and knives must check the requirements of the State Office so that it can present the certification and required documents that will prove that they are quite responsible for doing so carrying self-defense weapons ,
Exceptions of castles
One of the arguments provided by supporters of legalization of self-defense weapons is the general rule that human rights are superior to property rights and that general criminal law allows the use of required and proportional strength, non-deadly and deadly power (during instances) in defense Self Whenever the victim believes that the violation of the law will be used on Him. In their eyes, this is a sufficient rule that gives immanent rights to an individual to be taken with a tool or equipment that will make him feel safer.
In the past, one must prove that someone was afraid of his salvation in the house so he applied strength to intruders; However, Florida has now authorized homeowners to apply strength if necessary for each intruder who has entered your home in an illegitimate and strong manner. The causes argue that this law has provided excessive forces to homeowners because they legally allow homeowners to shoot or injure intruders. However, the court argues that the house is the castle of homeowners and is considered the most personal and safest place in the community for families. Anyone who disturbs this privacy must be prepared to suffer the consequences of his actions.
The task for backing himself
On the other hand, those who opposed the legalization of self-defense weapons such as weapons used the task to resign clauses where he stated that someone had another choice when attacked by the enemy. According to the task to resign clauses, as long as he can beg from an attacker he can do to prevent deadly blow attacks on the enemy. But, is someone who is obliged to retreat at a cost?
Certainly not! No one will retreat forever and just wait for him to be cornered! You need to save yourself from the possibility of danger and it will be a nightmare if you don’t have anything to give you additional defenses such as weapons and self-defense tools can provide. But where this can increase can be tragically for both parties. Every situation is different, but understanding your choice now, will make you in a matching mindset where the second split decision is needed to survive.
